Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by Law.com, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!

X

More On

San Jose sues Pillsbury Winthrop over confidential documents

California city accidentally gave docs to law firm, which now refuses to return them

Asking nicely doesn’t seem to be working for San Jose, Calif., so the city is taking it to the next level—filing suit against Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman, claiming the law firm refuses to give back confidential documents the city accidentally handed over.

Between December 2011 and June, San Jose released various documents to the firm in accordance with the California Public Records Act. But in August, the city realized those documents contained 11 email chains with information that was confidential, such as attorney-client privileged communication. City officials requested, via letters, phone calls and emails, that the confidential documents be returned to San Jose. The law firm has refused.

Last week, San Jose asked the Santa Clara County Superior Court to force Pillsbury to return the documents and to prevent it from distributing the confidential information. The court responded Friday morning by issuing a temporary order preventing the firm from disclosing or using the documents. The court also set a hearing for the case on Nov. 6.

According to Thomson Reuters, the reasons Pillsbury will not return the documents to San Jose are unclear.

Read more recent law firm news stories on InsideCounsel:

$17 million malpractice suit against DLA Piper dismissed

Court vacates $10.6 million malpractice judgment against Bryan Cave

HSBC sues Troutman Sanders for negligence

Former client sues Ropes & Gray for professional negligence

CFPB sues Los Angeles law firm

3M sues former law firm for its role in a lawsuit against the company

Watts Water sues Sidley Austin over FCPA error

Crowell & Moring settles Arntsen embezzlement suits

Court reinstates $500 million lawsuit against K&L Gates

 

Editor

Cathleen Flahardy

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.