Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Judge dismisses shareholder suit against Mark Hurd, HP directors

Another judge tosses suit claiming ex-CEO’s payout was excessive

It’s déjà vu at Hewlett-Packard Co. (HP).

Just three months ago, the computer maker’s board of directors breathed a sigh of relief when a Delaware Chancery Court judge tossed a shareholder lawsuit claiming they wasted company money by agreeing to pay former CEO Mark Hurd $12.2 million in severance pay and nearly $35 million in vested stock.

Now another judge has tossed a similar but separate shareholder suit against Hurd and a group of HP directors in which the plaintiffs claimed the ex-CEO’s payout was excessive and that the company didn’t benefit from approving the payment.

Hurd, who currently is president at software maker Oracle Corp., resigned from his position as CEO of HP in August 2010 amid allegations that he sexually harassed Jodie Fisher, an HP marketing consultant and former reality TV star. Although HP determined that Hurd didn’t violate its corporate sexual harassment policy, the company did find that he had falsified expense reports amounting to nearly $20,000 in an attempt to hide his relationship with Fisher.

The judge who tossed the shareholder suit in June wrote that HP’s directors acted in good faith in approving Hurd’s payout, even though the amount “may appear extremely rich or altogether distasteful to some.”

And yesterday, U.S. District Judge Edward Davila of San Jose, Calif., ruled similarly, finding that the plaintiffs failed to show that the board’s approval of Hurd’s payout wasn’t “a valid exercise of business judgment” in HP’s best interest.

Judge Davila gave the plaintiffs 30 days to file an amended complaint. Bloomberg Businessweek reports that the plaintiffs are demanding that Hurd disgorge to the company the payout he received upon his resignation.

Read more InsideCounsel stories about HP’s Hurd scandal:

Judge tosses HP shareholder suit over ex-CEO’s payout

Letter detailing Hurd’s misconduct is unsealed

C-Suite Scandal

Inevitable Impediment

Executive's Departure Offers Lesson on Handling Sexual Harassment Issues

Ashley Post

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.