Illinois sues Samsung, LG and other electronics companies for price-fixing

The complaint alleges the companies conspired to limit production of cathode ray tubes

A nice TV doesn’t come cheap, but the state of Illinois is getting suspicious about prices anyway. Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan filed a complaint on Tuesday, accusing several large electronics makers of conspiring to inflate the costs of TVs and computer monitors.

The complaint asserts that the companies, including Samsung Electronics Co., LG Electronics Co. and Philips Electronics North American Corp., agreed to fix the prices and limit production of cathode ray tubes, a component used in the manufacture of TVs and computer monitors. This allegedly went on from at least March 1, 1995 to Nov. 25, 2007.

Combined, the companies made billions of dollars from the sale of cathode ray tubes over that period. Some of the companies’ customers included such high-profile clients as Apple Inc., Dell Inc. and Hewlett-Packard Co.

Most of the companies named in the case declined to comment on the matter when asked by Bloomberg. But one company, Samsung Display Device Co. has already pled guilty and agreed to fork over $32 million for its role in the scheme.

 

Read more stories about price-fixing on InsideCounsel:

Large hotel chains and online retailers face price-fixing suit

9th Circuit revives dairy farmers’ price-fixing suit

Wal-Mart disapproves of $7.25 billion credit card fee settlement

Visa, MasterCard and banks agree to $7.25 billion settlement over credit card price fixing allegations

LG to settle price-fixing suit for $380 million

 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.