Brazilian court upholds ban against Chevron and Transocean

Since Brazil’s oil regulator failed to prevent a spill, it has no say in this decision

Brazil wants Chevron Corp. and Transocean Ltd. to stay out of its backyard, and it told the oil company and its drilling contractor as much on Tuesday when a panel of three Brazilian federal judges upheld the injunction that will keep the businesses from operating in the country.

Chevron and Transocean are banned from Brazil while the courts consider charges against the companies relating to a 3,600 barrel spill outside Rio de Janeiro in November 2011. In upholding the ban, the judges rejected arguments not only from Chevron and Transocean, but also from ANP, Brazil’s oil regulator, which argued that it, not the courts, had the authority to decide which companies can and cannot operate in the country.

That would normally be true, the judges said, except that in this case, ANP’s failure to regulate properly contributed to the spill. They cited an ANP report that said Chevron had "an insufficient culture of safety." Since the ANP knew that, the court said it "contributed to the accident by failing to do its job as a regulator." The ban will take effect in less than a month.

Read more at Thomson Reuters.

 

For more InsideCounsel stories on the Brazil spill and its attendant litigation, see below:

Second civil case against Chevron transferred to Rio de Janeiro

Brazilian oil workers union sues Chevron and Transocean

Brazil sues Chevron and Transocean over Rio de Janeiro oil spill

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.