South Korean court rules Apple, Samsung guilty of patent infringement

Companies must stop selling some smartphones and tablets in South Korea, but ruling will have little impact on pending U.S. trial

It’s likely that neither Apple Inc. nor Samsung Electronics Co. is happy with the outcome of a ruling a South Korean court delivered today in the bitter patent battle between the two companies.

Today a three-judge panel in Seoul Central District Court found that Apple infringed two Samsung patents, and Samsung violated one of Apple’s patents. Both companies must pay damages to each other and must stop selling the infringing smartphones and tablets—including Apple’s iPhone 4 and iPad 2 and Samsung’s Galaxy S, Galaxy SII, Galaxy Nexus, Galaxy Tab and Galaxy 10.1—in South Korea.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the ruling is more symbolic than impactive. Apple and Samsung are still engaged in international patent litigation with each other, and deliberations began this week in a high-profile jury trial in San Jose, Calif. Mark Newman, a senior research analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, told Bloomberg Businessweek that the South Korea ruling “will have little impact” on the U.S. case.

For more InsideCounsel stories on the Apple-Samsung patent battle, read:

Apple, Samsung CEOs talk but don’t reach settlement

ITC to review patent ruling against Apple

Apple tries to bar sale of new Samsung phone

Apple gains ground in patent suit against Google’s mobile operating system

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.