Patent trolls may have to pay legal costs

Proposed bill puts burden on plaintiff to pay fees if suit is likely to fail

Patent trolls beware! A couple of congressman may make business for you a lot harder.

Rep. Peter DeFazio, D.-Ore., and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R.-Utah, have introduced a bill that would make patent trolls—more kindly known as nonpracticing entities—responsible for the legal fees of defendants if a court decides the case doesn’t have a reasonable likelihood of success.

Patent trolls, by definition, purchase patents and then sue companies they claim are infringing those patents. Oftentimes, small companies are forced to settle those suits because it would be cheaper than engaging in expensive litigation—even if the patent troll’s suit has little merit. “This American Life” reported on the ongoing problem of patent trolls last year.

The new bill, called the Saving High-tech Innovators from Egregious Legal Disputes Act (the SHIELD Act), changes all of that.

“Patent trolls don’t create new technology and they don’t create American jobs,” DeFazio said in a statement. “They pad their pockets by buying patents on products they didn’t create and then suing the innovators who did the hard work and created the product. These egregious lawsuits hurt American innovation and small technology start ups, and they cost jobs. My legislation would force patent trolls to take financial responsibility for their frivolous lawsuits.”

DeFazio said he doesn’t know of any objections to the bipartisan SHIELD Act.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.