Target accuses paving contractor of racketeering

Claims several companies were in cahoots to fix prices and dispense kickbacks

Target Corp.’s refurbished parking lots may have been paved with dishonesty. In a federal lawsuit filed Friday in Minneapolis, the retail company accused a contractor, LCH Pavement Consultants, of racketeering. Target hired LCH in 2009 to handle $100 million in maintenance on parking lots at its stores across the U.S.

Target alleges that LCH conspired with other paving contractors in California, Illinois, Texas and Wisconsin (which are also defendants in this suit) and that together, they fixed and inflated prices, rigged bids and dispensed kickbacks. The lawsuit also claims that LCH would often overstate the amount of work that needed to be done, and would distribute work regionally to its co-conspirators.

The exact damages amount that Target is claiming remains unknown, but it is seeking triple damages. The company’s statement on the matter was as follows: "Accountability is the foundation of how Target does business, and we expect honesty from our vendor partners. Several paving vendors breached this trust by misrepresenting the services they performed on behalf of Target. ... Target is pursuing civil action to recoup the amount paid for services that were not performed, or performed in-part."

Read more at the Star Tribune.

 

For other InsideCounsel stories about racketeering, see below:

Okada amends counterclaim against Wynn, accuses GC of racketeering

District court dismisses many of Chevron’s claims against Ecuador

Alcoa asks judge to toss civil racketeering suit

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.