MGM sues over Raging Bull sequel

Studio calls follow-up film a “low-budget B-movie”

Here’s the truth: Most sequels don’t turn out to be on par with “The Godfather: Part II” or “The Empire Strikes Back.” So it’s not surprising that a sequel to one of the greatest movies of all time, according to the American Film Institute, would draw controversy.

On Tuesday, MGM Studios filed suit to stop the making of “Raging Bull II”, a sequel to the critically acclaimed, Oscar-winning 1980 film “Raging Bull,” which told the story of the rise and fall of boxer Jake LaMotta.

According to court documents, LaMotta was supposed to offer MGM the rights of first refusal for a film version of his 1986 book, “Raging Bull II.” The studio says LaMotta breached that contract when he entered into an agreement allowing RB II Productions to produce the sequel. MGM said in its complaint that RB II refused to comply with its demands to stop production.

The studio believes the sequel will “irreparably tarnish” the value of the first “Raging Bull” film, and it calls the second film a “low-budget B-movie.”

Raging Bull” was directed by Martin Scorsese and starred Robert De Niro, but neither is involved with “Raging Bull II.”

This is the second suit this year involving a sequel with a De Niro connection. In February, Paramount Pictures sued the estate of Mario Puzo, author of “The Godfather,” to stop publication of a second sequel titled “The Godfather’s Revenge.” De Niro had a starring role as the young Vito Corleone in “The Godfather II.”

Read Reuters and the Wall Street Journal law blog for more about this story.

 

 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.