Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Customer sues Adidas over barefoot running shoe

Plaintiffs says shoemaker misrepresented potential fitness benefits

Shoemakers better start paying attention to the accuracy of the claims they make about their shoes because consumers are taking them very seriously.

Yesterday, a New York man filed suit against Adidas, claiming the company’s “barefoot” running shoe isn’t doing what Adidas said it would. This is the second case in about a month involving false advertising claims over athletic shoes. In May, Skechers settled a suit with the Federal Trade Commission, 44 states and Washington, D.C., over claims about the health benefits of its toning shoes.  

In his suit, Joseph Rocco said he paid $90 for a pair of adiPure shoes, which are designed to mimic barefoot running, that he claims Adidas said in its ads would increase training efficiency and decrease risk of injury. The shoe did neither, the suit said. In fact, according to Rocco, the shoe actually increased the risk of bruising and foot damage because it is designed with less padding and deviates in other ways from the traditional running shoe.

Rocco—who suffered compound fractures after training in the shoes—seeks class action status, claiming Adidas never warned him and other runners of this increased risk of injury.

Although this is the first suit filed against Adidas over its barefoot running shoe, the maker of similar running shoe was sued for similar reasons in a class action filed in March.

This suit is only the latest in Adidas’ most recent legal woes. Last month, the company sued a rival shoemaker over a design similar to Adidas’ three parallel lines. 


Cathleen Flahardy

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.