Authors can sue Google in class action

Groups want to sue Internet giant over its plan to create digital book library

The case has been in the works for seven years. But yesterday, a judge finally ruled that thousands of authors can sue Google Inc. in a class action over the Internet giant’s plan to create the world’s largest digital book library.

Plaintiffs in the case, which was filed in 2005, claim that Google’s plan for its digital library to include millions of out-of-print works amounted to “massive copyright infringement.”

Google signed an agreement with several big research libraries in 2004 to copy the works and offer them in digital formats on its Google Books website. The company said its library would have been designed merely to help researchers and the general public find hard-to-locate materials. In those eight years, Google has since copied more than 12 million works but had only planned to provide short excerpts of them in accordance with fair use law.

In his ruling, U.S. Circuit Judge Denny Chin said it would be more efficient for plaintiffs to sue as a group so not to risk disparate results or “exponentially” higher costs of individual suits.

Read more about this suit on Thomson Reuters.

For previous InsideCounsel stories about this ongoing case, see:

Google in talks with authors, publishers

Google gets two months to finalize Google Books

Google loses book case

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.