Jury says Google didn’t infringe Oracle’s patent

Oracle said Google’s Android violated its IP

A California jury has decided that Google Inc.’s Android mobile platform does not infringe Oracle Corp.’s patents.

In the case that dates back to 2010, Oracle claimed that Google’s Android technology violated the intellectual property rights Oracle held to the Java programming language. Google fought back, saying Oracle couldn’t copyright certain parts of Java, which is an open-source software. Yesterday, a California jury agreed with Google.

Earlier this month, the jury found that Google did use Oracle’s Java interfaces when developing its Android mobile phone systems, but at the time, it could not decide whether that fell under the fair-use doctrine.

Cozen O’Connor Partner David Sunshine told Thomson Reuters that Oracle stood to gain huge payouts had it won the case, given the growing market for Android devices. “It’s a huge blow,” he said.

An Oracle spokeswoman said the company plans to continue to defend and uphold Java’s unique functionality. But for now, Google is pleased with the outcome.

"We didn't want to back down when we felt the facts were on our side," Google GC Kent Walker told Reuters.

Next up for Oracle? The company heads back to court next week to fight it out with Hewlett-Packard Co. over HP’s Itanium processor. 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.