Gucci wins trademark infringement cases against Guess

Gucci said Guess knocked off some of its designs

Gucci may not be getting even close to the full $120 million it was seeking in its trademark infringement suit against Guess Inc., but it is walking away the victor.

Yesterday, a U.S. district court judge awarded Gucci only $4.66 million, saying while Guess did indeed infringe on some of Gucci’s marks, Gucci was not entitled to damages for lost sales or harm to its brand. Judge Shira Sheindlin went on to say that Gucci’s expert analysis was “highly speculative.”

The Italian apparel designer, more formally known as The House of Gucci, sued Guess claiming the American clothing company “Gucci-ized” many of its products by mimicking Gucci’s trademarked designs on wallets, belts, shoes and other items.

In the suit it filed in 2009, Gucci said that Guess infringed on six of its designs. In February, Judge Scheindlin had allowed Gucci to pursue claims regarding four of those trademark infringement claims: its green-red-green stripes, a script logo, a stylized "Square G" and a group of four interlocking "G"s known as a "Quattro G."

Paul Marciano, CEO of Guess, released a statement saying the judgment showed Gucci had "overreached" and "misled the court with a number of facts that were unsupported by the evidence." He added, "Overall, we are extremely satisfied and vindicated that this case should have never been filed.”

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.