Settling multidistrict litigation

Creating a resolution strategy early can save time and money during settlements

As we’ve seen with several recent highly complex cases, creating a resolution strategy at the beginning of a dispute can save both time and money before litigation costs mount. Although 95 percent of cases settle before trial, the eventual settlement often takes place following a number of hours and dollars spent preparing for litigation.

Take for example when a corporation has been sued in a variety of jurisdictions, and the cases have been consolidated into a multidistrict litigation (MDL), which is a federal procedure designed to consolidate and process complex cases. Typically the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (MDL Panel) assigns one federal judge to coordinate cases spread out across the U.S. The purpose of this centralization process is to avoid duplication of discovery, prevent inconsistent pretrial rulings and promote efficiency for counsel and judges. The Panel remands transferred actions not terminated in the transferee district to their originating transferor districts at or before the conclusion of centralized pretrial proceedings. Generally, the appointed MDL judge oversees the settlement process, creating it in conjunction with the plaintiff steering committee, the defendants’ settlement counsel and a settlement special master or mediator.

A key part of settlement strategy for the defense is to create a national settlement team whose sole job is to resolve the litigation. The settlement team needs a lead counsel whose only focus is settling the case. The counsel should be a respected trial attorney with knowledge of the mediation process, the ability to work effectively with plaintiffs counsel and great perseverance. Settlement counsel will work together with both trial lawyers and in-house counsel to learn the case and strategize for settlement. With an overall settlement strategy in place, they can focus discovery, which is often the most expensive aspect of litigation, on key issues.

Many courts will appoint a mediator or mediation panel—usually agreed to by the parties—to help the parties resolve the cases in coordination with national settlement counsel and a plaintiffs’ steering committee.

The mediator assigned to the litigation develops a deep understanding of the issues and knowledge of settlement values for the individual claims. Some judges take a very active role in resolving their assigned MDL matters, holding mediations at the courthouse with the assistance of the mediator. There are many paths to coordinating mediation. The mediator can work with individual firms to settle cases individually or in a pool, and also can work with the plaintiffs’ steering committee to resolve cases on a global basis.

Having a well-coordinated litigation and settlement team with a succinct strategy for settlement is a cost-effective and efficient process for resolving MDLs.

About the Author
Kim Taylor

Kim Taylor

Kimberly Taylor, Esq. is the Chief Operating Officer at JAMS, the largest private provider of mediation and arbitration services worldwide.  She oversees JAMS operations in the United States. Working directly with the President and CEO, and leading a team that spans nearly 25 resolution centers nationwide, Taylor is responsible for the company’s day-to-day operating activities. She can be reached at ktaylor@jamsadr.com.

About the Author
Catherine Yanni

Catherine Yanni

Cathy Yanni is a full-time ADR specialist with a practice that includes mediation, Special Master/Discovery Referee, arbitration, and class action settlement administration. She has successfully mediated, arbitrated, or acted as Special Master/Discovery Referee in more than 1,000 matters. She can be reached at cyanni@jamsadr.com.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.