Johnson & Johnson heads back to court in Risperdal suit

Company announced $158 million deal with Texas in January over marketing of the drug

The drama surrounding Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) antipsychotic drug Risperdal is far from over.

Tomorrow, J&J will head back to a Texas courtroom to further discuss the $158 million settlement it had reached with the state in January. The state-specific suit would fully resolve all Risperdal-related claims in Texas, J&J said in January.

"As far as we knew, we had a solid settlement," Tom Kelley, a spokesman for Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, told Thomson Reuters. "We'll have more information on Tuesday about what has caused [J&J] some concerns."

The case dates back to 2004 when the U.S. government began a civil investigation against J&J claiming the pharmaceutical company marketed the schizophrenic drug for unapproved illnesses, including bipolar disorder, dementia, and mood and anxiety disorders. Soon after, individual states, including Texas, began suing J&J over Risperdal marketing. The Texas suit and settlement, which was the first among all state Risperdal litigation, does not involve other state or federal litigation over Risperdal.

The case’s plaintiff—Allen Jones, who blew the whistle on J&J’s marketing practices—told Thomson Reuters he believes the pharmaceutical company is going to try to reduce the amount of the settlement he and his lawyer receive. J&J "has reneged on the agreement and it's back in court. They are trying to produce a chilling effect on the ability of whistleblowers to come forward," he said.

Before J&J lost its patent on Risperdal, it was the company’s best-selling drug.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.