Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Judge says Big Tobacco’s free speech rights were violated

FDA’s cigarette labeling requirement is unconstitutional

A U.S. judge yesterday ruled that the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) requirement that tobacco companies include graphic labels on cigarette packaging is unconstitutional.

The labels the FDA required cigarette companies to include on their packages were meant to illustrate the dangers of smoking. They included disturbing images of rotting teeth, diseased lungs and a dead man lying in a morgue, among others.

In 2009, Congress passed a law requiring the FDA to adopt labeling regulations for cigarette companies that mandated color warning labels big enough to cover the top 50 percent of a cigarette pack's front and back panels and the top 20 percent of print advertisements. Several Big Tobacco companies fought back, filing suit against the FDA and claiming the labels required them to engage in anti-smoking advocacy against their own products, which are legal.

In his 19-page ruling yesterday, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon said, "The government has failed to carry both its burden of demonstrating a compelling interest and its burden of demonstrating that the rule is narrowly tailored to achieve a constitutionally permissible form of compelled commercial speech."

Last year, the same judge granted the Big Tobacco companies preliminary injunction, blocking the new requirement from taking effect. The Obama administration has appealed that ruling.


Cathleen Flahardy

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.