Mattel wins dismissal in Bratz case

MGA Entertainment sued Mattel for antitrust violations

A judge in California Tuesday dismissed an antitrust case associated with the long-running IP battle between rival toy makers, Mattel and MGA Entertainment, over the Bratz fashion dolls.

The battle dates back eight years. In 2004, Mattel had sued MGA, accusing the company of stealing its trade secrets for the fashion doll after former Mattel employee and Barbie designer Carter Bryant, who created Bratz, joined MGA. In 2008, a jury awarded Mattel $100 million, but a federal appeals court overturned that ruling in 2010. MGA was victorious in the retrial in August 2011 when the judge awarded it $310 million, attorneys’ fees and other costs associated with the long-running litigation. Mattel is currently appealing that ruling.

Separately, MGA sued Mattel, claiming it was violating antitrust laws by instituting a strategy to “litigate MGA to death” to ensure it lost its market share of fashion dolls.

"MGA's current and prior claims are the same," and the law "bars a later claim that is based on allegations of misconduct of which the claimant was previously aware and had alleged in the prior case," U.S. District Judge David Carter wrote in his decision. Carter dismissed the case with prejudice, therefore MGA may not bring it again.

Regardless, MGA plans to appeal. "The judge dismissed on a technicality," MGA CEO Isaac Larian said in a statement. "We will pursue Mattel accordingly until they stop their monopolistic behavior."

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.