Grand jury hears Avon FCPA case

Cosmetics company accused of breaking foreign bribery laws

Avon Products Inc. is learning that makeup can’t conceal all blemishes.

Last fall, federal prosecutors began investigating the New York-based cosmetics company for possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). Today the Wall Street Journal reported that prosecutors recently presented evidence to a grand jury in the case against Avon.

Prosecutors are focusing on a 2005 internal audit report, in which Avon determined that employees in China may have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to bribe Chinese officials. Avon previously had claimed it first learned of the bribery allegations in 2008, at which time it launched its own investigation into the misconduct.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation and U.S. prosecutors are investigating whether current or former Avon executives ignored the 2005 audit’s findings. Two people familiar with the matter told the Wall Street Journal that Avon executives didn’t disclose the audit’s findings to the board until 2008.

Avon executives could be held liable for the alleged bribery through a concept known as willful blindness, or avoiding learning of wrongdoing, even though they didn’t authorize illegal payments or try to hide evidence of the bribes.

Several high-ranking Avon executives were terminated following the probe. The company fired Vice Chairman Charles Cramb on Jan. 29, and it also fired Ian Rossetter, head of global internal audit and security, in May 2011. Last year, Avon fired three of its Chinese executives, including the general manager of the company’s Chinese unit, the CFO of the Chinese unit and the head of corporate affairs for China.

The case also has tarnished the reputation of Avon’s 12-year CEO Andrea Jung, who said in December 2011 that she would step down from her post once the company found a replacement.

Read the Wall Street Journal for more about the case.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.