Regulatory: The advantages of alternative dispute resolution

ADR deflects the unwanted regulatory attention brought on by litigation

In the face of possible litigation, counsel’s decision whether to invoke an arbitration or mediation clause typically involves a complex consideration of cost, timing, fairness, contractual obligations, impact on the desired outcome, the ability to prevail against the other party, and reputational effects on business and consumers. Counsel often consider how customers, investors, and potential business partners may react to public information. However, businesses too often overlook another factor in deciding to opt for alternative dispute resolution (ADR) or court.

Drawing any attention to legal conflicts can be bad for business, but there is an aspect to this obvious point that is often overlooked when deciding whether to pursue litigation: unwanted regulatory attention. Businesses should be mindful that government investigations can begin in many ways; one of the easiest triggers is the contents of a newspaper article. Even a brief, public allusion to a potential claim, much less any mention of an internal investigation or audit, may raise enough law enforcement interest to spark an informal investigation that could turn into something much bigger. It is important to be mindful of this consequence before engaging in any saber-rattling.

author image

Lisa Noller

Lisa M. Noller is a partner and member of the Government Enforcement, Compliance & White Collar Defense; Business Litigation & Dispute Resolution and Securities Enforcement...

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.