SEC changes its “neither admit nor deny” policy for settlements

The regulator claims the change has nothing to do with Citibank settlement rejection

On Friday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) said that companies who have already admitted wrongdoing in criminal cases will no longer be able to “neither admit nor deny” their misconduct when settling with the SEC over the same allegations. The SEC claims that this policy change has nothing to do with Judge Jed Rakoff’s recent rejection of its settlement with Citibank, despite the fact that Rakoff criticized the “neither admit nor deny” practice in his decision.

SEC Enforcement Director Robert Khuzami wrote in a statement that “the new policy does not require admissions or adjudications of fact beyond those already made in criminal cases, but eliminates language that may be construed as inconsistent with admissions or findings that have already been made in the criminal cases.”

This language change will hopefully help eliminate the silliness of cases such as that of Bernie Madoff, who famously pleaded guilty to taking part in a multi-billion dollar Ponzi scheme in 2009, but neither admitted nor denied the charges in his settlement with the SEC. However, while the new policy makes the SEC look more flexible, especially in light of the Citibank settlement rejection, since it doesn’t require companies to admit anything they haven’t already owned up to, in practice, little may actually change.

Read more in Thomson Reuters and the Wall Street Journal.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.