Ontario’s multibillion-dollar tobacco lawsuit can proceed

Canadian province is suing 14 tobacco companies for smoking-related health care costs

Litigation-wise, 2012 may not be the best year for the tobacco industry. Last week an Ontario judge announced she would allow a $48.82 billion lawsuit against a group of 14 tobacco companies to proceed.

In September 2009, Ontario, Canada’s most populated province, sued a group of tobacco companies—including Rothmans Benson & Hedges, which is partly owned by Philip Morris; Imperial Tobacco Canada Ltd., a unit of British American Tobacco; and Japan Tobacco—claiming the companies knew that cigarettes were addictive and posed major health risks that they misrepresented to the public. The suit seeks past and ongoing health care costs tied to tobacco-related illnesses that Canadian taxpayers have paid since 1955.

Seven of the companies named in the suit filed an application to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming the court had no jurisdiction over them. But Ontario Superior Justice Barbara Conway rejected their application and is allowing the lawsuit to proceed.

“We will continue to vigorously pursue this litigation on behalf of all Ontarians,” Ontario Attorney General John Gerretsen said in a statement on Friday.

Thomson Reuters reports that other Canadian provinces also are suing tobacco companies in an effort to recoup health care costs. Ontario currently has a C$16 billion deficit, the largest of any Canadian province, and much of it comprises health care. The Canadian government claims smoking is the leading cause of premature death and illness in Ontario and costs the health care system C$1.6 billion each year.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.