More On

Lloyds sued for misleading U.S. investors

Shareholders allege the bank’s former execs misled them about takeover of HBOS

Despite the fresh calendar on the wall, echoes of the 2008 financial crisis already are reverberating in the new year. Lloyds Banking Group is under fire from a putative class of American shareholders alleging the British bank and its executives misled them over the bailout of fellow financial services company HBOS in 2008.

Lloyds’ board of directors is accused in the lawsuit of making misleading statements about its takeover of HBOS, which the government orchestrated. At the time, Lloyds then-CEO Eric Daniels hailed the move as a “fantastic opportunity to create the U.K.’s leading financial services group and create value for both sets of shareholders.”

Things, however, didn’t turn out as rosy as Daniels predicted. Just weeks later, Lloyds accepted a government bailout in order to receive a £17 billion influx in exchange for a 43 percent stake in the business.

According to the suit, Lloyds shareholders were not informed about the woeful state of HBOS’ finances, which only came to light after HBOS posted a £10 billion loss in February 2009, thereby immediately plunging Lloyds shares 32 percent on the London Stock Exchange. The shareholders also claim that HBOS was insolvent within weeks of the takeover being announced, and was reliant on funds from the Bank of England and the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank to keep its head above water. All of this information, the shareholders allege, was withheld.

For more, read Reuters.

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.