Former Fannie, Freddie execs sued by SEC

Agency claims firms misrepresented exposure to subprime mortgages

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a flurry of lawsuits today against former executives of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac for allegedly misleading investors about their exposure to subprime mortgages.

The suits, filed in Manhattan federal court against ex-execs, claimed the two government-sponsored firms misrepresented their exposure to subprime mortgages. The SEC alleged that senior executives of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) also distorted information on “Alt-A” loans between December 2006 and August 2008, while the executives of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (Freddie Mac) made false statements between March 2007 and August 2008.

“This action arises out of a series of materially false and misleading public disclosures,” the SEC said in its complaint.

Former Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd and former Freddie Mac CEO Richard Syron are named as defendants, along with Enrico Dallavecchia, former chief risk officer for Fannie Mae, Thomas Lund, former Fannie Mae executive vice president, Patricia Cook, ex-executive vice president of Freddie Mac and Donald Bisenius, Freddie Mac’s former senior vice president. The firms themselves are not named as defendants in the case.

In April 2007, Mudd said in a hearing that Fannie Mae’s exposure to subprime loans “remains minimal, less than 2.5 percent of our book.” Syron echoed Mudd at the same hearing, claiming Freddie Mac had not “been heavily involved in subprime all along.” However, the firms were seized by regulators 18 months later in September 2008 after losses caused by insufficient loans almost led to their bankruptcies.

After reaching civil nonprosecution pacts with the SEC, Fannie and Freddie will accept responsibility for their conduct and cooperate in the agency’s litigation against the former executives, which seeks unspecified damages.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.