Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

BofA’s attempt to disqualify AIG law firm rejected

Judge says partner’s minimal involvement outweighs conflict of interest

Mired in legal woes, Bank of America (BofA) suffered another blow when its attempt to disqualify the law firm representing American International Group Inc. (AIG) in its $10 billion mortgage fraud lawsuit was rejected Tuesday by a federal judge.

U.S. District Court Judge Barbara Jones ruled the alleged conflict of interest had “no meaningful showing” of any impact on the trial process for the lawsuit.

BofA raised the question in October against a partner of the law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, aiming to remove the law firm from the case. The partner in question, Marc Becker, had previously defended BofA’s subsidiaries Merrill Lynch & Co. and its First Franklin Financial Corp. unit against similar charges of mortgage fraud. At the time, Becker was a partner at Munger, Tolles & Olson and moved to Quinn in 2008.

Though Quinn Emanuel removed Becker form the AIG case after just 5.8 hours of work, BofA argued that Becker’s involvement broke crucial ethical rules, as Becker could release confidential information.

However, Jones ruled that Becker’s minimal involvement in the case and AIG’s established relationship with the law firm offset the possibility of disclosure of confidential client information.

“Screens erected immediately upon discovery of the conflict weigh against disqualification,” Jones explained in her ruling.

She also cited Becker’s physical distance from the case, as he is based in the firm’s London office, and the size of Quinn Emanuel, with more than 500 lawyers, as reasons for her decision.

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.