Aetna files antitrust lawsuit against Michigan Blue Cross Blue Shield

Insurer accused of paying hospitals that agreed to charge more to competitors

Consumers who already feel like they pay out the nose for health care will likely be angered by a new lawsuit claiming a major health insurer in Michigan unfairly caused premiums to rise throughout the state.

Yesterday, health insurance company Aetna Inc. filed an antitrust lawsuit against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Michigan’s biggest health insurer, in which it alleges that Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan raised rates to consumers and gave the extra money to hospitals that agreed to charge higher prices to the insurer’s competitors. Aetna says the scheme hurt its efforts to expand its business in Michigan. The company currently has roughly a 5 percent market share in Michigan, while Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan provides insurance to at least 60 percent of residents in the state.

The anti-competition allegations aren’t new. In October 2010, the Department of Justice sued Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, claiming the insurer forced 70 Michigan hospitals to give it the best prices in the state. The Detroit Free Press reports that the Michigan Attorney General’s Office supports the government’s lawsuit.

The Wall Street Journal notes that the allegations against Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan reflect the continuing argument nationwide about whether consolidation within the health care industry increases costs.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.