Retailers claim Pfizer kept generic drug off the market

Walgreens, others say pharmaceutical company violated U.S. antitrust law

Pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. was accused by Walgreen Co. and several other prescription drug retailers of violating U.S. antitrust law. The retailers claim Pfizer’s Wyeth unit and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd illegally kept a generic version of popular antidepressant Effexor XR off the market.

Walgreens, Safeway Inc., Kroger Co., Supervalu Inc., HEB Grocery Co. and American Sales Co. filed the complaint on Nov. 30, accusing Pfizer of engaging in “an overarching anticompetitive scheme to prevent and delay the approval and marketing of generic versions of Effexor RX,” which caused them to overpay.

The retailers say Wyeth kept generic equivalents off the shelves from June 2008, when the original Effexor compound patent lapsed, through at least June 2010.

According to the complaint, the pharmaceutical company obtained fraudulent patents, fabricated litigation and entered into a price-fixing agreement with Teva to delay the entrance of cheaper generic equivalents.

However, Pfizer spokesman Christopher Loder said in an emailed statement to Reuters, “Pfizer categorically denies the claims asserted in the plaintiff’s complaints. Wyeth obtained its patents protecting Effexor XR lawfully, and the company intends to defend itself vigorously against these claims.”

The complaint was made public Thursday by the U.S. District Court of Trenton, N.J.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.