Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


More On

Greenberg’s bailout suits against U.S. government face legal challenges

Experts say the former AIG chief’s lawsuit will fail

Former American International Group Inc. CEO Maurice Greenberg’s $25 billion lawsuit against the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York filed in mid-November has become a significant takings case challenging legal precedents.

Greenberg’s company, Starr International, claimed the 2008 bailout by the U.S. government that took 80 percent of AIG stock was unconstitutional and violated the “takings clause” of the Fifth Amendment.

Tim Massad, assistant secretary for financial stability at the U.S. Treasury, said in a statement the government’s actions were “necessary, legal and constitutional.” However, the defendants face a formidable opponent in Starr’s attorney David Boies, known for representing the U.S in the 1999 antitrust trial with Microsoft Inc. and Al Gore in the election recount in 2000.

“Any time David Boies is asking for $25 billion, I would say this is not a normal case,” Robert Thomas of Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hasters tells Bloomberg.

However, lawyers say the case will be an uphill battle for Starr and Boies. Greenberg Traurig Shareholder Jerry Stouck told Bloomberg Starr must accept the government’s reasons for the action first, because it’s “assumed that if they took your property, they did it for a good reason.” Though the bailout was a voluntary contractual relationship, Starr must show that it lost “all or substantially all use and value of the property from the imposition of a regulation,” says attorney Robert Freilich of Freilich & Popowitz in a Bloomberg report.

Meanwhile, Professor Richard Epstein of New York University School of Law tells Bloomberg the suit will fail.

“The basic rule is when you sue the Federal Reserve acting in its regulatory capacity, even for outrageous things, they win,” Epstein says.

The case is currently in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Washington, which handles cases against the federal government.

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.