Class action lawsuit claims Roto-Rooter bills customers for unnecessary work

Consumers say plumbing company falsely assessed repairs, overcharged for services

Roto-Rooter is under scrutiny for allegedly deceiving customers into paying for unnecessary repairs. Three Minneapolis consumers slapped the plumbing service company with a class action lawsuit Monday.

Plaintiffs Dawn Mills and LuAnn and Michael Cosgrove claim Roto-Rooter violated state “truth-in-repair” laws and pressured them into overpaying for repairs. According to the lawsuit, Mills called the company last December after her sewer backed up and was told she had to pay $8,750 to repair a broken pipeline.

However, a city inspector later assessed the problem and told Mills she had overpaid, as there was no indication the pipe had been broken.

“They took advantage at my being at a disadvantage,” Mills said in an interview.

Similarly, the Cosgroves were charged $5,235 for repairs that a city inspector later said weren’t needed. LuAnn Cosgrove says in the suit that she wanted to wait to repair the plumbing in her home, but when Roto-Rooter said her basement could flood with sewage, she agreed to the repair.

The Minneapolis Police Department is also handling a city investigation after receiving numerous consumer complaints against Roto-Rooter over the past year. The police searched the company’s Plymouth, Minn., offices and obtained customer files and DVDs of drain lines.

Roto-Rooter released a statement saying it does not comment on pending litigation. The lawsuit is seeking class action status as well as unspecified damages.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.