MGA Entertainment and Orrick call it quits

Law firm says Bratz dollmaker didn’t pay its bills

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe recently parted ways with one of its clients. After the law firm cited nearly $4 million in unpaid legal fees, a California federal judge granted Orrick’s motion to withdraw as counsel to MGA Entertainment, the maker of Bratz dolls.

The firm took MGA on as a client back in 2009 after a jury awarded Mattel $100 million in a closely followed copyright case regarding MGA’s Bratz dolls. Mattel had sued, alleging that one of its doll designers developed the Bratz dolls while working at Mattel, then secretly took the idea to MGA, and a California jury ruled in favor of Mattel.

Orrick handled MGA’s appeal of that decision and won in April, when the 9th Circuit reversed the lower court’s ruling and awarded MGA $85 million in damages.

According to Orrick’s motion to withdraw as MGA’s counsel, the company had set up a payment plan with the firm in December 2010, but Orrick has only seen several payments since then and claims MGA still owes it millions.

Read more about this story in the Wall Street Journal’s Law Blog.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.