Citigroup announces $285 million settlement in negligence suit

SEC cracks down after bank allegedly misled investors about a $1 billion collateralized debt obligation

Citigroup Inc. yesterday agreed to settle negligence charges from 2006 and 2007 for $285 million based on charges brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The bank’s primary broker-dealer subsidiary, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., allegedly mislead its investors about a $1 billion collateralized debt obligation (CDO).

The SEC’s director of the Division of Enforcement, Robert Khuzami, said in a statement that the investors deserved better treatment than Citigroup afforded them.

The investors, Khuzami said, “were not informed that Citigroup had decided to bet against them and had helped choose the assets that would determine who won or lost.”

Pending court approval of the settlement, Citibank will allocate the $285million among those investors who lost money. The bank refused to admit or deny the SEC’s negligence claims, and explained in a statement that the SEC did not charge CGMI or any individuals with any intentional or reckless misconduct in connection with Citigroup’s CDO business activities.

The SEC, however, singled out Brian H. Stoker, a leader in Citi’s CDO restructuring group, who has since been released by the company. Fraser Hunter, Stoker’s attorney and a partner at Wilmer Hale, denies the charge.

Hunter told the Washington Post that the SEC lacks a strong connection between his client and the bank’s selection of assets.  

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.