Morrison on Metrics: 5 kinds of averages

Is your knowledge above- or below-average when it comes to averages?

Everyone in a law department ought to understand plain-vanilla averages—and be above-average if they know four more variations.

 

1. Mean: The mean of a group of numbers—a data set—is its arithmetic average. Add up the lawyers in each of the 10 law firms you pay the most and divide that sum by 10, that’s the arithmetic average of their lawyers—the mean of that data set. With small numbers of observations, means give a distorted result if there is an abnormally high or low value. So, consider a trimmed mean.

2. Trimmed Mean: A trimmed mean shaves off some number of extreme values. A common choice is to omit the 2 ½ percent of the numbers at the low end and the 2 ½ percent at the high end of a sorted list. Thus, if you have revenue for 50 companies sorted high to low, you would drop the two smallest and the two largest. Then calculate the mean. You might not be sure the trim is sufficiently deep. So, consider a middle average.

3. Middle Average: Another technique to avoid anomalous outliers might be called the average of the middle. After ranking a data set, drop the top and bottom quartile (25 percent) and calculate the average of the middle 50 percent. If you want to know your average discount granted, look at all your invoices from last year, rank them from high to low and drop the top and bottom 25 percent. Then average the middle half. You could think of this as a huge trimmed mean. But neither the trimmed mean nor the middle average reflect some characteristic of the numbers being calculation. So, consider a weighted average.

4. Weighted Average: Each figure in a data set is assigned a weight. For example, count the number of contracts reviewed for six business units during a year and weight those counts by the annual revenue of the unit. You multiply the number of contracts for a unit by the unit’s revenue and divide the total of those six products by the total revenue of the units. Weightings are the equivalent of having that many like items with the same value involved in the average. If you have no basis for a weighting, you might aggregate your two numbers into an all-encompassing average. So, use an overall average.

5. Overall Average: This is my term for another measure of the center of a data set. An overall average gives more influence to larger figures in a data set. It does so because it adds up all of the figures for the metric that is in the numerator (the top number of a fraction) and divides it by the sum of all of the numbers in the denominator (the bottom number). The weighted average totals both pieces of the ratio and divides them. If you do this for legal staff per billion dollars of revenue, very large law departments influence the overall average more than do the smaller ones.

About the Author
Rees Morrison

Rees Morrison

Rees Morrison, Esq. is the founder of General Counsel Metrics, LLC. Based in Princeton, NJ, Rees has for the past 25 years consulted solely to law departments on a wide range of management challenges: operational reviews, cost control, re-engineering, structure and organization assessments, client satisfaction, technology, benchmarking. Rees has assisted more than 275 law departments on four continents. He also coordinates the largest law-department benchmarking database and analysis ever conducted with more than 1000 participants. 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.