Full Tilt Poker fights back against DOJ

Attorneys for online poker website say owners didn’t run a Ponzi scheme

Earlier this week the Justice Department (DOJ) sued the owners of the online poker website Full Tilt Poker for allegedly defrauding its thousands of online poker players out of more than $440 million. But the card sharks aren’t going down without a fight. 

On Wednesday, lawyers representing Full Tilt say the company didn’t run a Ponzi scheme, as U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York Preet Bharara claimed in a press release. Rather, the gambling website merely may have been a mismanaged business operation.

“A Ponzi scheme requires an investment vehicle in order to receive a certain rate of high return,” said Jeff Ifrah, an attorney for Full Tilt CEO Raymond Bitar. “None of those things happened here.”

According to the Wall Street Journal, the “Ponzi scheme” label is troubling to Full Tilt because it could mean that it will lose its license to operate outside the U.S.

The DOJ claims Full Tilt’s board allegedly misrepresented the security and availability of players’ funds, which were purportedly used to pay the board members and owners. The government claims the scheme took place between April 2007 and April 2011, when the company stopped operating in the U.S. 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.