UBS shareholders may not file securities fraud lawsuits

Bank’s litigation exposure over rogue trader may be limited

Last week, UBS announced that a rogue trader caused it to lose more than $2 billion from unauthorized trades. Today, Reuters reports that UBS shareholders have yet to file any class action lawsuits against the Swiss bank.

The lack of litigation is unusual because similar scandals typically result in plaintiffs lawyers rushing to file class actions on behalf of investors who allegedly were harmed.

According to Reuters, UBS shareholders in the U.S. will face hurdles if they do pursue litigation.

First, UBS has stated that no client money was involved in the alleged fraud.

Second, U.S. securities law says that damages can’t exceed the difference between the amount that shareholders paid for their shares and the average price of the company’s stock over a 90-day period beginning on the day the misleading information was made public, so if UBS stock rises, it would minimize possible damages.

Finally, the Supreme Court ruled in 2010 in Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd. that shareholders couldn’t bring claims for shares purchased on foreign exchanges. Only 12 percent of UBS shares are listed in the U.S., so the bank’s exposure to class action litigation brought by U.S. shareholders would be limited. 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.