California employers don’t have to force meal breaks

Recent case sides with employer in meal-break suit

For years, employment litigation in California has been fodder for discussions among lawyers. The state’s laws tend to favor employees in many areas of labor and employment law. But a recent decision in a California meal-break case gave employers some relief.

Several employees of concrete company Granite Rock had filed suit against their employer claiming Granite Rock did not provide them adequate meal breaks or pay them for the extra hour they worked by not taking the break. The plaintiffs sought more than $6 million in damages and penalties.

Granite Rock argued that it did provide the break times, but that some of its employees voluntarily chose to waive their rights to take them. The company said it wasn’t its duty to ensure the employees took those breaks.

Yesterday, the Santa Clara County Superior Court agreed with the defendant, saying in its decision it is not the employer’s duty to ensure employees are taking the breaks as long as the breaks are offered.

"We are pleased with Judge Kleinberg's ruling," said Alan Levins, a shareholder at Littler Mendelson and lead attorney for the defendant. "At the center of this case is the clarification of a critical wage and hour issue; that employers are required to make meal periods available to employees but are not required to force employees to take a lunch break."

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.