Facebook battle drags on in Massachusetts

Winklevoss twins pursue suit claiming Facebook didn’t divulge IMs during discovery

The infamous court clashes between Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg aren’t over yet.

The Winklevosses, as well as their business partner Divya Narendra, sued Zuckerberg in 2007 for allegedly stealing their idea for ConnectU—a social networking website for Harvard University students—and transforming it into Facebook. The legal battle came to a close with a settlement in 2008 in which the Winklevosses and Narendra received $20 million in cash and Facebook stock worth $45 million.

But the plaintiffs appealed the settlement, arguing that their compensation wasn’t sufficient because Facebook’s true value had been misrepresented during proceedings. In April, the 9th Circuit ruled that the settlement was adequate.

The Winklevoss twins and Narendra announced June 23 that they would drop their challenge to the 2008 settlement and not appeal it to the Supreme Court. However, according to the Wall Street Journal, they will pursue a separate lawsuit in a Massachusetts district court in which they claim Facebook suppressed evidence—specifically, instant message conversations between the Winklevosses and Zuckerberg dating back to 2004, when Facebook was founded—during the discovery phase of the 2008 settlement negotiations.

Facebook says the allegations are meritless and have already been rejected by the courts.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.