EPA to regulate greenhouse gas emissions

U.S. Supreme Court ruling blocks eight-state lawsuit against utility companies

The Environmental Protection Agency now has the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from power plants, the U.S. Supreme Court said on Monday. The ruling blocked a federal lawsuit by states and conservation groups that were trying to force cuts in power plant emissions.

The lawsuit brought by eight states—California, Connecticut, Iowa, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Wisconsin—targeted the five largest utility companies, Xcel Energy, American Electric Power Co. of Ohio, Cinergy Co., Southern Co. Inc. of Georgia and the federal Tennessee Valley Authority.

The Supreme Court voted 8-0 to block the suit. 

Xcel welcomed the high court’s ruling and said it looks forward to working with the EPA on regulations regarding carbon dioxide and other gasses without the threat of lawsuits.

Greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, have been linked to climate change.

The court had declared in 2007 that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases are air pollutants under the Clean Air Act, and that the EPA had authority to regulate those emissions for new cars and trucks. The same reasoning now applies to power plants.

The EPA said it will impose new regulations regarding the greenhouse gasses by May 2012.

Xcel Energy applauded the Supreme Court decision because it will allow the utility to work with the EPA on greenhouse gas regulations "without the threat of continued litigation," Xcel spokesman Steve Roalstad said.

 

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.