NCAA lawsuit dismissal reversed

The 7th Circuit reversed a federal judge's dismissal of a 2009 case against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) filed by a group of consumers from New York, Arizona and Oregon claiming that the Indianapolis-based NCAA's lottery for tickets to sports tournaments produced unlawful profits.

In a 2-1 decision, the court decided to send the case back to lower court because the NCAA's actions may violate Indiana law prohibiting any entity other than the state from running a lottery. The suit is the result of a $6 to $10 "handling fee" charged to entry into the lottery, even for applicants who don't receive tickets. Judge Richard Cudahy dissented, saying that the defendants were aware that a blind lottery was possible and that Indiana's lottery law doesn't apply to sales pursuant of a valid contract.

For its top-rank Division I basketball and hockey games, the NCAA accepts more applications than it has tickets to sell.

Rob Carey, the plaintiffs' attorney, said the process would have been legal had refunds been issued to unsuccessful applicants. The NCAA no longer charges the fee to those who don't receive tickets.

The lawsuit, filed in May 2008, originally named Ticketmaster Entertainment Inc. as a defendant. Ticketmaster, now part of Live Nation Entertainment Inc., settled in 2009 and agreed to refund unsuccessful applicants' handling fees for the preliminary rounds of that year's NCAA basketball tournament.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.