Netflix Nixes Contest Over Privacy Concerns

Netflix decided Friday to suspend a second contest to improve its movie recommendation system after the FTC expressed concerns over how the contest might impact subscribers' privacy. The movie-by-mail provider also settled a lawsuit filed by KamberLaw over the same contest.

The contest was a follow-up to a 2006 competition that challenged participants to use various bits of customer data to develop a more accurate automated method for recommending movies. A New Hampshire woman filed suit over the first contest in December 2009, alleging in the complaint that people could figure out she was a lesbian based on personal information, such as movie ratings, released in the contest. The ratings were assigned numbers associated with the subscriber who entered them, which Netflix claimed provided anonymity. The plaintiff in Doe v. Netflix, Inc. claimed that despite Netflix's efforts at confidentiality, it could still be possible for her identity to become public. That case is pending.

In a statement, Netflix's Chief Product Officer Neil Hunt said the company had productive discussions about privacy with the FTC and attorneys from KamberLaw regarding the second contest.

"The resolution to both matters involves certain parameters for how we use Netflix data in any future research programs," Netflix Chief Product Officer Neil Hunt wrote on the company's blog. He did elaborate on those parameters.

For the full statement, visit the Netflix Blog: Netflix Contest Update

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Reduce eDiscovery Costs and Risks through Email Disposition

Read this white paper to learn best practices on determining email retention periods with real...

Prepare for the Eventuality of eDiscovery Now and Reap the...

This report presents an overview of eDiscovery implementation challenges organizations may face as well as...

The Fastest and Most Cost-Effective Document Review Available!

Recommind's Predictive Coding is the market's only solution that allows clients the option of reviewing...

Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.