Beginning Next Week: InsideCounsel will become part of Corporate Counsel. Bringing these two industry-leading websites together will now give you comprehensive coverage of the full spectrum of issues affecting today's General Counsel at companies of all sizes. You will continue to receive expert analysis on key issues including corporate litigation, labor developments, tech initiatives and intellectual property, as well as Women, Influence & Power in Law (WIPL) professional development content. Plus we'll be serving all ALM legal publications from one interconnected platform, powered by, giving you easy access to additional relevant content from other InsideCounsel sister publications.

To prevent a disruption in service, you will be automatically redirected to the new site next week. Thank you for being a valued InsideCounsel reader!


Varying Views

To read the full story about FRE 502, click here.


The scope of change created by FRE 502 varies by jurisdiction because courts established different standards prior to the rule's enactment, according to David Lender, partner at Weil, Gotshal and Manges. The majority of courts established a balanced approach concerning privilege waiver.

In Federal District Court for the Southern District of New York cases, such as Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc. v. Levi Strauss & Co., and in the Federal District Court for the Northern District of California, such as Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. Garvey, the courts established a multifactor reasonableness test.

In jurisdictions that established a strict test, such as the Federal District Court of Massachusetts (Ares-Serono, Inc. v. Organon International) and the District of Columbia (Underwater Storage, Inc. v. United States Rubber Co.), the effect of the new rule may be more dramatic.

Michael Kozubek

Bio and more articles

Join the Conversation

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.