From the January 2007 issue of InsideCounsel Magazine • Subscribe!

Arizona Citizens Seek Blind Justice

Enjoying the latest blockbuster flick can be a challenging experience for blind or deaf individuals.

However, a group of Arizonans are hoping to change that by requiring all AMC Entertainment theaters in the state to install devices that would aid people with sight and hearing disabilities.

Representing several citizens, the state of Arizona filed suit against AMC in the Superior Court of the State of Arizona on Dec. 1, accusing the movie theater giant of discrimination.

"AMC Entertainment Inc. does not provide sufficient auxiliary aids and services for the class of persons who are deaf or hard of hearing and the class of persons who are blind or visually impaired to allow for full and equal enjoyment of movies shown at their theaters," the complaint states.

Specifically, the suit claims AMC theatres do not offer enough captioning for the deaf nor equip sufficient theaters with "descriptive video" services for the visually impaired. The case cites an example of a plaintiff who was unable to enjoy "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire" at an AMC theater because the theater lacked the devices necessary to accommodate his visual impairment.

According to the complaint, only about 4 percent of the screens AMC owns and operates are equipped to provide captioned moves and described movies. However, according an AMC spokeswoman Melanie Bell, AMC has at least one screen at each of its Arizona multiplexes equipped for use with captioning and description systems.

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

Health and Safety Risks of Counterfeits in the Global Supply...

This whitepaper underscores the prevalence of counterfeits within global supply chains across a number of...

Get the facts you need to Help Implement Sound Legal...

This whitepaper will examine the cases that are setting precedents. Download "Legal Hold and Self-Collection:...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.