Video Game Makers Settle FTC Charges

The companies that developed and marketed the popular "Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas" video game agreed to settle Federal Trade Commission charges that they failed to disclose the game's hidden sexual content. The settlement, announced June 8, is subject to final FTC approval following a public comment period that ends July 10.

Although players of the game could not access the sexual content during normal game play, a program posted on the Internet by a third party, dubbed "Hot Coffee," revealed the content, which included nude female images and a sex mini-game.

The Entertainment Software Rating Board (ESRB) originally rated the game "M" for Mature, meaning the content was appropriate for those aged 17 and older. Later the ESRB re-rated the game AO (Adults Only), meaning content that should only be played by persons 18 or older. The companies subsequently released a patch that disables the "Hot Coffee" program and recalled the inventory for re-labeling. They also published a second, M-rated edition of Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas without the hidden nude images and mini-game.

Under the agreement with the FTC, Take-Two Interactive Software Inc. and its subsidiary, Rockstar Games, agreed to prominently disclose on packaging and advertising any content relevant to a game's rating and to implement a system ensuring that all content is considered in preparing submissions to a rating authority. The companies would be subject to penalties of up to $11,000 per violation if they violate the order.

"Parents have the right to rely on the accuracy of the entertainment rating system," Lydia Parnes, director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said in a statement. "We allege that Take-Two and Rockstar's actions undermined the industry's own rating system and deceived consumers. This is a matter of serious concern to the Commission, and if they violate this order, they can be heavily fined."

Comments

InsideScoop Daily eNewsletter

InsideScoop delivers the latest-breaking news affecting in-house counsel. Get the latest business trends, current corporate litigation, labor developments, technology initiatives and more — FREE. Sign up now!

You have been subscribed! You will receive a confirmation email soon.

See the entire list of InsideCounsel eNewsletters.

Resource Library


Bring the Benefits of Decision Tree Analysis to Your Everyday...

In this on-demand webinar, learn how to counter the challenges of litigation with predictive analytics...

13 Things to do Now to Reduce Risk and Avoid...

We have developed best practices for lowering your e-Discovery costs, shortening the length of your...

7 Simple Strategies for Improving Legal Fee Budgeting Certainty

Understanding the legal fee budgeting paradigm and following seven simple strategies will help you control...

Complimentary White Paper: Best Practices for Meeting Critical eDiscovery Challenges

Packed with practical advice, this white paper discusses best practices for meeting eDiscovery challenges across...

Complimentary White Paper "Key Considerations for Collection Methodologies and Resources"

This white paper addresses the need for companies to reevaluate their current collection policies in...

Moving Matters In-House: How Technology Enables Legal In-Sourcing

Strategically shifting more matters to in-house counsel has proven to be an effective strategy to...

5 Ways to Promote Responsible Content Sharing

Find out five ways that organizations can promote responsible sharing of content among employees by...

Reducing the Costs of eDiscovery from Collection to Court!

Predictive coding is only one of many ways organizations can make eDiscovery faster, cheaper and...

Discovery Shifts to the Cloud

Adoption of Cloud computing continues to gain momentum. How can IT and Legal Teams avoid...

Lower Your Total Cost of Ownership

With the deployment of Proofpoint Enterprise Archive, organizations have realized significant cost savings in automating...

View All »

Advertisement. Closing in 15 seconds.